Ithaka

Personal tools
Home »  Ithaka S+R »  Research »  Documents for a Digital Democracy

Documents for a Digital Democracy: A Model for the Federal Depository Library Program in the 21st Century

Ithaka-S+R-final-logo_art-(2).jpgThe Association of Research Libraries (ARL) and the Chief Officers of State Library Agencies (COSLA) retained Ithaka S+R to conduct a comprehensive study on the state of the Federal Library Depository Program (FDLP) and to recommend how to respond to changes in an increasingly digital, networked environment that have caused a decline in incentives for libraries to participate in the Program. The report from this project is now publicly available following extensive research and community engagement. 

Methodology

Ithaka S+R interviewed nearly 90 individuals, including librarians from 40 institutions as well as representatives of the Government Printing Office (GPO) and a number of other key stakeholders.  In developing this study, Ithaka S+R emphasized incorporating the views and priorities of a broad spectrum of FDLP stakeholders. In October, in order to stimulate discussion and reactions in preparation for the final report, Ithaka S+R released an interim summary report and presented at the Association of Research Libraries and the Depository Library Council.  

The Issues Identified 

Participating libraries in the FDLP, like many libraries, contend with a rapidly changing environment for information dissemination, access, and usage.  The Program, while building infrastructure to adapt to the digital environment, has not addressed the core strategic dilemmas associated with this new environment:

  • Many federal depository libraries no longer have the right incentives to remain in the Program, which may threaten the preservation of and access to the historical print collections.

  • The historical collections are dramatically underutilized in relation to their potential value.

  • Newly released digital government information is not adequately preserved. 

  • Discovery systems do not effectively serve user needs for seamless and immediate access. 

Without substantial structural change, the FDLP risks sliding further into irrelevance and the general public’s need for sustainable, no fee, permanent access to government information will be increasingly threatened.

Recommendations

Following a thorough examination of the Program’s current state, this report suggests a vision for the program: seamless, no fee access to government information for a range of potential users at their point of need and appropriate preservation of this material for future generations. To achieve such a vision, the FDLP community must address five key goals:

  1. Newly issued government information must be made freely available in digital form and must be preserved for the long-term. 

  2. To provide this permanent public access for the historical collection, a significant program of retrospective digitization is required. 

  3. Print will play a significantly reduced role for access by users to the historical collections, so some original print copies must continue to be preserved even though fewer depository library collections overall will be required. 

  4. The print format will continue to have advantages for certain subsets of material types and user communities, so the Program must provide appropriate access to certain historical and new materials in print form, where appropriate via print on demand.

  5. Depository libraries must reemphasize their commitment to serving user needs for outreach, discovery, and access. 

The project team worked with many in the community concerning the Program’s future, and the report has benefitted tremendously from these conversations. Working towards a strong vision for the future of the FDLP, the federal government, librarians, and the general public, can together reinvigorate this Program and see it continue its role in American democracy.

We encourage you to share your thoughts with us and with the community by posting your reactions using the comment feature below. 

Download the full document

You may also sign up for updates.

Consultation with Federal Agencies?

Posted by Fed Staff at January 05, 2010 09:40 AM
I'm curious whether the study talked with any of the producers of federal documents? GPO has isolated Federal agencies and has done a horrible job of engaging the producers of information products about their relationship to the depository library program. GPO is a broker of information and they have never adequately managed their relationship to individual departments and agencies. Shouldn't any overhaul include repairing that relationship as well?

The relationship between GPO and federal document producers

Posted by Roger C. Schonfeld at January 05, 2010 11:48 AM
Thank you for your this question. We agree that the relationship between GPO and federal agencies producing government information should be improved. On page 42 of the report, we recommended:

"Pursuant to existing law and regulation, GPO should continue to work with federal agencies to have their digital publications accessible to the FDLP through deposit in FDsys. GPO should continue to lower the cost of participation by developing new tools that simplify submission to FDsys and integrate into agencies’ existing web production processes. And to create stronger incentives, GPO should explore possible ways to increase the value of deposit, perhaps providing value-added services to agencies in exchange for their contribution in FDsys. For example, FDsys might be able to serve as a content management service for production and not just publication of materials."

We did not, however, speak directly with producers of federal documents to refine this recommendation with greater detail. I would be interested to learn more about why you see the relationship as "horrible" and some of your recommendations for how it can be improved?

Best,

Roger

Carrot and Stick

Posted by Lori S. at January 06, 2010 01:11 PM
Generally I think the report is thorough and the conclusions are accurate. However, I think federal agencies do need additional incentives to cooperate with GPO in preserving digital information. GPO has tried to lure them into cooperation with positive, carrot-type incentives, but there also need to be some negative, stick-type penalties for failing to cooperate with GPO. Perhaps Title 44, Chap. 35, Sect. 3511 could be changed to establish FDSys as the official Government Information Locator System with GPO placed clearly in charge. Or, some language could be added to Title 44, Chap. 41, Sect. 4101 to require agencies to cooperate with GPO in operating its "electronic storage facility for Federal electronic information." Something in the law needs to clearly state that agencies have a responsibility to work with GPO to ensure that their information is preserved for permanent public access.


Powered by Plone, the Open Source Content Management System